From 8b7160d213701eed35f7fb23b4ec80490971c641 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: stpohle <stpohle>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 23:57:19 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] another few fixes for the timeing. -usleep isn't that good
 i've gone back to select

---
 src/gamesrv.c |  2 +-
 src/sysfunc.c | 20 ++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/gamesrv.c b/src/gamesrv.c
index e5f11d6..f58c42b 100644
--- a/src/gamesrv.c
+++ b/src/gamesrv.c
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ gamesrv_getserver ()
             ds = 0;
             SDL_Flip (gfx.screen);
         }
-		s_delay (250);
+		s_delay (25);
     }
 
 
diff --git a/src/sysfunc.c b/src/sysfunc.c
index 07e10e5..2f8f057 100644
--- a/src/sysfunc.c
+++ b/src/sysfunc.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* $Id: sysfunc.c,v 1.11 2003/05/07 20:19:20 stpohle Exp $
+/* $Id: sysfunc.c,v 1.12 2003/05/07 23:57:19 stpohle Exp $
     sysfunc.c - this file hold some routines for the system functions..
     like d_delay
 */
@@ -6,23 +6,19 @@
 #include "bomberclone.h"
 #include "sysfunc.h"
 
+/* i have no banned usleep completly, even usleep would 
+   bring the cpu usage more down. but i found out that 
+   usleep is not as excact as select is. */
 void
 s_delay (int ms)
 {
     fd_set selectset;
     struct timeval tval;
 
-#ifndef _WIN32
-	if (ms < 20) {
-#endif
-		FD_ZERO (&selectset);
-		tval.tv_sec = 0;
-		tval.tv_usec = ms * 1000;
-		select (1, &selectset, NULL, NULL, &tval);
-#ifndef _WIN32
-	}
-	else usleep (1000 * ms);
-#endif
+	FD_ZERO (&selectset);
+	tval.tv_sec = 0;
+	tval.tv_usec = ms * 1000;
+	select (1, &selectset, NULL, NULL, &tval);
 };
 
 int